<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Betwixt | Reprex</title><link>https://reprex.nl/tag/betwixt/</link><atom:link href="https://reprex.nl/tag/betwixt/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Betwixt</description><generator>Wowchemy (https://wowchemy.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 09:00:00 +0200</lastBuildDate><item><title>Building Heritage Digital Twins with Open-Source Tools</title><link>https://reprex.nl/event/2026-09-15_digital_twins_workshop/</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 09:00:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://reprex.nl/event/2026-09-15_digital_twins_workshop/</guid><description>&lt;p>At &lt;strong>EADH2026 in Kraków&lt;/strong>, we organised the practical methodology workshop
&lt;em>Building Heritage Digital Twins with Open-Source Tools: Human-in-the-Loop
Semantic Knowledge Production from Documentary Evidence&lt;/em>.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The workshop moved from a simple question — &lt;strong>how does documentary evidence
become trustworthy, machine-actionable knowledge?&lt;/strong> — to a practical workflow
for constructing Heritage Digital Twins. Using a small cultural heritage
dataset, participants worked with observations, candidate semantic assertions,
human review, provenance, and review states.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>A central part of the workshop was hands-on experimentation with &lt;a href="https://usebetwixt.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Betwixt&lt;/a>,
our open-source semantic review tool. Participants could inspect documentary
evidence, review proposed classifications and relationships, correct or reject
candidate claims, and experiment with multilingual descriptions. The exercises
showed how the same knowledge can move between human-readable review tables and
atomic semantic assertions while keeping the review process explicit.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The workshop connected these practical exercises to a broader methodology for
&lt;a href="https://downloads.reprex.nl/2026/eadh2026/EADH_HDT_workshop.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">human-in-the-loop semantic knowledge production&lt;/a>: automated tools and AI can
propose candidate knowledge, but competent human review determines what becomes
part of a warranted knowledge state. Provenance, uncertainty, rights, and
governance can therefore remain part of the resulting Heritage Digital Twin
rather than being added afterwards.&lt;/p>
&lt;h3 id="conference-contributions">Conference contributions&lt;/h3>
&lt;ul>
&lt;li>European Association for Digital Humanities 2026. &lt;em>Linking Europe: Digital
Humanities Without Borders. Book of
Abstracts.&lt;/em> &lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22078031" target="_blank" rel="noopener">10.5281/zenodo.22078031&lt;/a>.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Presentation of our conference paper:&lt;/strong> &lt;em>Heritage Digital Twins Beyond
Modelling.&lt;/em> Download
&lt;a href="https://reprex.nl/presentations/2026/20260916_D_Antal_EADH2026_HDT_beyond_modelling.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">PDF&lt;/a>.&lt;/li>
&lt;li>&lt;strong>Poster:&lt;/strong> &lt;em>From Fragmented Heritage to Federated Digital Twins: Results from
the Finno-Ugric Data Sharing Space.&lt;/em>
&lt;a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22807041" target="_blank" rel="noopener">10.5281/zenodo.22807041&lt;/a>&lt;/li>
&lt;/ul></description></item></channel></rss>